together. Ministry was to flow from relationship and not relationship from the ministry.
I outlined these ideas and presented them to the elders of New Song Church, where served as associate pastor. Within a month or two, the elders gave their blessing to “The Summit Fellowships,” a network of small, functionally autonomous, voluntarily interdependent, home-based churches.
The name for the community of tiny churches was taken first, from the “Prayer Summits” where the initial inspiration for it began. Secondly, a passage of scripture, II Peter 1:18 embodied our desire for each gathering: “This voice we heard from heaven while we were with Him on the holy mountain.”
Since 1990 the learning curve has often been steep. Without the structural pattern that most of us were used to, many of the familiar road signs for success were gone. It wasn’t until the “summits” had been in existence for nearly two years that we discovered that we weren’t alone in this business. We found that there were other “house churches” and “home church networks” elsewhere in the country. Books had been written. Others had embarked on similar adventures and were willing to share their experience.
Nevertheless, nearly all of the forty or so charter members eventually returned to more traditional churches where gatherings were more predictable and the future more tangible. Eventually, new people began to appear. Disenfranchised churchgoers, new believers, tired Christians looking for a more relational church life.
This gave us confidence. We looked at the New Testament with renewed conviction that what the Summit Fellowships had set out to do was not only biblical, but part of a renewal stream in the church in America.
~Dan Mayhew, 1998 |